I usually take for granted the representation
strategy for Senate and House of Representatives. Occasionally, I’m reminded of how weird
Senate presentation is. A few years ago,
Hendrick Hertzberg addressed this in his blog.
When the founders worked out this system, a compromise (hated by some of
them) giving two senators to every state meant that some of the small states were
getting twelve times as much representation as states of larger
population. Now, says Hertzberg, “Two hundred and
twenty years later, the absurdity is five and a half times worse: a Wyoming
voter gets sixty-eight times more representation in the Senate than a
Californian.” It’s now something that is
often mentioned, but I don’t think I like it. (Hat tip also to Jonathan Chait.)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment